Contextual AI Analysis

Set the Stage

• Tell the AI your role before you begin—plaintiff's counsel, defense, preparing for trial, analyzing prior testimony—so it filters the material through the right lens. Timeline: 24 hours before • Priority: High

• Specify the case type: personal injury, employment, contract dispute, medical malpractice, or whatever applies. Timeline: 24 hours before • Priority: Medium
• State your legal theory or primary argument so the AI knows what it's looking for. Timeline: 24 hours before • Priority: Medium
• Identify the key disputed facts upfront so it knows the central points of disagreement the analysis should focus on. Timeline: 24 hours before • Priority: Medium
• Note any relevant statutes, regulations, or case law that should inform how the AI evaluates the testimony. Timeline: 24 hours before • Priority: Medium

Focus the Analysis

• Direct the AI toward specific aspects of the testimony rather than asking for a general review: liability arguments, damages evidence, witness credibility, timeline discrepancies, or policy compliance. Timeline: 24 hours before • Priority: Medium

• Ask the AI to compare testimony across witnesses on a specific topic rather than summarizing each deposition in isolation. Timeline: 24 hours before • Priority: Medium
• Request that the AI flag areas where testimony conflicts with documents, policies, or other witnesses' accounts. Timeline: 24 hours before • Priority: Medium

Stress-Test Your Position

• Ask the AI to identify the strongest arguments against your position based on the testimony, not just the points that support you. Timeline: 24 hours before • Priority: Medium

• Ask what opposing counsel would likely argue based on what the witnesses said. Timeline: 24 hours before • Priority: Medium
• Use the AI to surface gaps: what events are referenced but underexplained, what documents are mentioned but not produced, what questions should have been asked but weren't. Timeline: 24 hours before • Priority: Medium