AI’s Doesn’t Just Produce Faster Legal Work, It Produces Better Work: Insights from Daniel Schwarcz

Quotes:

1. “We found significant improvement in efficiency, but where we really saw differences in how human lawyers who had these tools performed was in the quality of their work. Not only were the folks who participated in our study performing and providing us with legal work really quickly relative to those without AI, but they were providing better work.”

2. “These tools are really powerful right now in terms of helping many younger lawyers with very common tasks and tasks that require a significant amount of intellectual rigor and analytical depth. Our participants in general reported increased personal satisfaction in completing the tasks with AI compared to not AI. They felt it was empowering.”

3. “What the empirical evidence does is it grounds us in where we are now and where we were a few months ago. And that’s really important because there’s a tremendous amount of hype around AI and a tremendous amount of skepticism around AI.”

4. “AI can give you answers that seem really good, but they may not always be really good if you are not an expert in the field. The ideal world where AI is most useful is for people who are already experts, who already understand a problem, who are using AI to help them produce an answer.”

5. “Do I worry that AI in five years, ten years is going to really change the practice of lawyering and maybe even make certain jobs completely automated? Yeah, I do. We are trying to see if we can get an AI system that can provide effective legal advice to small business startups. That would do everything that a lawyer would do.”